Posted by: koherston | April 7, 2010

Heffington v. Heffington

There are several holdings of interest in the recent Heffington case:

  1. In a post-divorce proceeding to modify a parenting plan, the trial court found Mother had “been inflexible in working with Father” regarding his parenting time and had done little to foster the children’s relationship with Father, all of which constituted a material change of circumstances that allowed the parenting plan to be revised.  The Court of Appeals affirmed.
  2. The trial court erred by refusing to consider the preference of the parties’ 14-year old child, the trial court stating it did “not want to hear” the child’s testimony.  The Court of Appeals held this was clear error.
  3. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to award attorney’s fees to Mother because both parties contributed to the prolonged discovery process.  Each party had to pay its own legal fees and expenses.

Heffington v. Heffington (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2010).


Responses

  1. […] said it before and I’ll say it again: a parent should do everything he or she can to encourage, […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: