The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. Father argued Daughter’s decision to forgo a nearly full scholarship at Auburn to attend Vanderbilt was unreasonable. Daughter explained she chose Vanderbilt over Auburn because she wanted to attend “a really good school,” which necessarily excludes Auburn by definition (that’s my editorial comment and is not in the Court’s Opinion). A picture is worth a thousand words, however.
The Court of Appeals agreed that Daughter’s choice was reasonable. Mother was awarded her attorney’s fees on appeal.
Not that we needed it but now we have a judicial determination that Vanderbilt is superior to Auburn. Go Vandy!
Brinton v. Brinton (Tenn. Ct. App. May 19, 2010).
Information provided by K.O. Herston, Tennessee Divorce Lawyer and PROUD Vanderbilt alumnus.
